The Evangelicals..
In this paper, you are required to write a critical review of Frances Fitzgerald’s book, The Evangelicals: The Struggle to Shape America. All relevant information discussed in your paper must be based on the book. Your essay should not be longer than five pages (double-spaced, 12 fonts Times New Roman). The minimum page number is four. You can use any format as long as you are properly following the rules. Ideas borrowed must be acknowledged. *IMPORTANT* This is NOT a book review, this is a sociological review of the book. Use the sociological approach to the role of religion on society. Reference Emil Durkheim, Weber, etc and their views on religion and the social processes. Focus on most important themes of their views on this book. No personal views! Use citations from the Introduction to Sociological Therory By Dillon (Second Edition) A successful paper has the following features. Numbers in parenthesis are the number of possible points that you can get. The total number of points that you can have is 50. 1. Relevant topic on the subject is discussed, and appropriate interpretations are provided. Does Not Meet Expectations (0); Approaches Expectations (5-6); Meets Expectations (7-8); Exceeds Expectations (9-10) 2. By attending to specific cases, the paper shows the relevance of Fitzgerald’s argument. Does Not Meet Expectations (0); Approaches Expectations (5-6); Meets Expectations (7-8); Exceeds Expectations (9-10) 3. It discusses the relevance of the views of Fitzgerald’s points to the understanding of contemporary issues in the United States Does Not Meet Expectations (0); Approaches Expectations (1-2); Meets Expectations (3); Exceeds Expectations (4) 4. The paper is organized and well written. The thesis statement is concise and clear. The author clearly and successfully transitions from one point to another and paper is free from stylistic errors including grammar and spelling. Does Not Meet Expectations (0); Approaches Expectations (1); Meets Expectations (2); Exceeds Expectations (3) 5. Ideas borrowed are properly acknowledged. ASA style. Does Not Meet Expectations (0); Approaches Expectations (1); Meets Expectations (2); Exceeds Expectations (3)